Phish.net is a non-commercial project run by Phish fans and for Phish fans under the auspices of the all-volunteer, non-profit Mockingbird Foundation.
This project serves to compile, preserve, and protect encyclopedic information about Phish and their music.
Credits | Terms Of Use | Legal | DMCA
The Mockingbird Foundation is a non-profit organization founded by Phish fans in 1996 to generate charitable proceeds from the Phish community.
And since we're entirely volunteer – with no office, salaries, or paid staff – administrative costs are less than 2% of revenues! So far, we've distributed over $2 million to support music education for children – hundreds of grants in all 50 states, with more on the way.
You do realize you're being negative about what you perceive to be a negative review, and that you didn't bother to take the time to bless us with your positive, no doubt articulate and witty and magnificently insightful and original views of last night's glorious music, including its Sample Moma openers of course?
Look, I realize a small number of fans out there are crybabies and are so insecure about their own Phish opinions that they come to this site and read its blog posts and hope to have their own opinions about the music (be it of last night's show or a show 300 years ago) validated. But that's sad, and I don't have to like it. Because I don't.
I think every Phish fan should be as opinionated as possible and have whatever god damn opinions about the music they want to have, commensurate with their experience of Phish's music -- which is 99.9% likely to be PROFOUNDLY different from my own.
I would also much rather read an articulate and negative-on-the-whole review about a Phish show than shovel-through a bunch of flowery psychedelimalodorous bullshit describing in painstaking detail ad nauseum how, in essence, a particular jam made the reviewer's balls tingle.
$0.02.